A6000

No. It’s just stuff. Digital cameras are meant to be replaced. I have a bunch of analog cameras I hold more dear to. But if I need to get rid of it to pay bills, then off it goes. Most cameras that the average person has is just a mass produced tool, you can always get another one. It’s not a 1/50 L

The Sony Aps-c naming convention is awful but it works like this: Entry level: a6000 (2014) replaced by a6100 (2019) Midrange: a6300 (2016) replaced by a6400 (2019) Enthusiast: a6500 (2016) replaced by a6600 (2019) One aps-c to rule them all: a6700 (2023) That’s how you get an a6400 that’s newer tha

Ich habe im Studium viel mit Sony Kameras gearbeitet (a6000, A7, FX3) und mein Fazit war bei der Marke immer „Technisch gut (auf dem Datenblatt - aber macht null Spaß zu benutzen. Schreckliche Menüs und furchtbare Ergonomie.“ Bin nun fast 10 Jahre mit Fuji unterwegs und nutze das System auch berufli

"I’m just looking for an affordable camera that takes awesome pics" The camera won't do that. The photographer does that. its a 12 year old camera. capable of good images. in general, i found all Sony cameras that I tried from around that time period to have difficult ergonomics/user interface. I fo

I'd agree to some extent but I will play devil's advocate and say I really didn't get excited again until I purchased my first full frame camera and dropped some serious coin on very fast lenses. In the past, I always had middle of the road bodies with mediocre lenses. I used them for what they were