LUMIX S9

I'm sorry but I feel like Panasonic is helpless. They swing and miss with everything since the GX85. I love what they are trying to do but this leaves so many questions. I also love Emily's videos, but she is a content creator, she raves about a camera like the OM-3, then a couple weeks after her "1

I'm not a huge fan of the S9 body. It's more of a fashion accessory, and it's not even that small, all things considered (no EVF, no MSHTR - at least it's got IBIS). I would like to see the sensor in a G100 body - with IBIS. Probably not realistic though - both physically and considering how Panason

So, having lived in Japan I can tell you it's much less important to Japanese consumers how 'old' a camera is. The dedicated photographers tend to lean towards reliable technology and have affection for proven bodies, while the mass market leans towards small, cute and easy to use. There's no 'chasi

the big problem is that its worse in every way to an a7c, or a7cii you cant make up excuses for not having critical features when your competitors can include the same features with cameras of the same size and price. the design, lack of buttons, no sd card and even no ibis would be fine disregardin

It's certainly not aimed at pros, unless a wedding photographer wants a B cam for stylized shots. Yet it's priced high enough to exclude most casual users. Every brand is hopping on the bandwagon with this rangefinder-esque style: Nikon Zf, Lumix S9, Sony A7C. I love the way all of these cameras loo

I made the switch from G85 to G9 to S5 two years ago. Sold my complete MFT-equipment since and never looked back. My main reasons: - I wanted more low light performance indoor when shooting the kids running around - I wanted a fast zoom lens that lets you shoot with a shallow depth of field - For al

I just bought an S9 to supplement my Canon R7, and while I haven’t done much testing yet I can say the ergonomics are awful (as you’d expect), the build quality lacking (especially the buttons and dials), and the thing isn’t that compact or light (feels like a brick), the autofocus is worse (though

There have been some quality of life issues with build quality since the S5ii on Lumix bodies, which is a shame. The leatherette not adhearing is a common issue with bodies from the S5ii onwards. The S9 has issues with it's dials, specifically it's backdial. My OG s5 is nearly perfect since I got it

After reading your post and all the replies, my advice to you is to get the Osmo. I genuinely think it would be a better camera for you. First of all, the stabilisation is better than the Lumix. The camera is lighter to carry around, particularly at arm's length, and it offers a wider field of view

I have S9 and A7CR. I am really not seeing any point of this. You are just arguing now you can apply LUTs and is "WAY Better" because you don't need to do as much post work. granted! that's a plus... but that you are also assuming no one else knows how to use LUTs on a sony footage. which is like..