LUMIX S1H

Not sure how you think the S9 has better low light performance than the other two. They're all in the same ballpark. Don't buy into the myth about megapixels. A 61MP FF is better than a 12 MP in low light when it comes to photos. https://youtu.be/gAYXFwBsKQ0?si=eN7HTxr5Hg-0xKN6 Same with video. High

The S9 feels like Panasonic’s shot at Fuji’s X100 VI, with a touch of Leica in its design. It is clearly aimed at people who are new to the Panasonic S line, at travelers who want something light, at street photographers who need discretion, and at influencers who want portability without losing qua

I know this ups the price a lot, but I am debating between an S1H and the S5iix at the moment as well... https://kolarivision.com/product/olpf-aa-filter-upgrade-for-panasonic-lumix-s1-and-s5-cameras/ ETA: I wouldn't recommend the S1H to somebody who relies on autofocus.

Yes, you are absolutely right. What I've seen is what a lot of those YouTubers have come to realize: there is really no one perfect camera. It's actually why I'm having to get two cameras, to cover all the situations I'm thinking about. But no one camera will perfectly have everything, frustratingly

Using also the S1II/S1RII Panasonic and the A7CII/A7III (I also had the FX3), the Z6III has : -The best skin tones.-Excellent AF, almost as good as Sony and better than Panasonic, even compared to the S1II.-6K Raw video full sensor up to 60fps. Neither the S1II/S1RII or A7CII/FX3 has this (the S1II