Z6III FX-format Mirrorless Camera Body

If you go with Nikon, take a look at the Z5ii. It's cheaper than the Z6iii, and I suspect it would fit your needs. Spend the savings on a better lens.

Nikon Z6III, Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and the ultra wides is the Laowa 12mm f2.8. It was actually pretty difficult using the f2.8 zoom and I really regretted not bringing my 1.4 35mm and 50mm but still got some good photos!

I was a Sony APS-C shooter for a long time. From Sony NEX 5 to A6000 and to A6400. I loved my A6400 but the desire to move to full frame got the best of me and I sold my camera and lenses and was thinking of buying the Nikon Z6III. But after I sold everything I had second thoughts regarding the Niko

Hey, since you're a beginner, I would advise you to go with Nikon. What I see people saying is repeating platitudes about Sony's "better af" but that is not useful by any means. Cause "af" is not a single parameter, plus: every system has different strong points for "getting a shot". Why I would adv

I used to buy high end cameras. F5 then bypassed d100/d200/d300 and went straight to D3/D3s/D4/D4s. couldnt stand the look of the dx sensors. I was the last to hold out with film. I dont buy into hype and dont have any FOMO ever. I realized after buying a d750 to replace my d3s (was well over 600k c

Came from a lumix s5iix which is very similar to the nikon z6 iii I in size, dimension and weight, and I found no much difference in weight while carrying the nikon z8 around, to me the nikon z8 feels more natural in my hands. Just like you I was in the same predicament, but I knew if I bought the z

Buy the Canon, or consider an A7V. The Nikon has better lenses, sometimes, but it usually comes with a bigger cost. The Nikon throat is 1mm larger than Canon RF. So, meh. Canon has the better mid-range setup, in a lot of ways. Money, size, weight, and 1st party. RF 16-28 f/2.8 & RF 28-70 f/2.8, and

Im working my way to your setup tbh, currently with Z6iii and PF 800 and I’ve sold 70-200 I would wait for the new premium body after summer but I also hope for high resolution amateur body (deliberately castrated) that would suit me on the trail. Nikon is significantly behind every other mount now

I don't know if this is rage bait or not, but perhaps more likely user error if the Z50II feels slow and or less reliable compared to a D500. The Z50II is objectively superior to the D500 in terms of speed, and especially autofocus performance/reliability (huge improvement there). Z bodies have a le

A7v, it's just better in all the right ways. Nikon has to hit back now, but it's gonna be at least another 18 months probably. Real talk, the A7v improves all the things photographers want. Just to elaborate, the A7V has: - An open mount - Smaller lenses, and more varied lenses, just as good if not