Z6III FX-format Mirrorless Camera Body

You're using a lower quality DX lens on a full frame body. This hurts my brain. I'm going to reply with the assumption that you're not intentionally trolling this community. Be aware that your camera automatically detects this and will shrink down your resolution to something like 10 megapixels, res

Hi guys, A few months ago I became a happy owner of a Sirui Astra 50mm T1.8 lens. In my almost 30 years of photography career (don't think about big things, I am just a simple country "do-it-all" photographer), I practically saw the world in 3:2 aspect ratio. I went through a big part of the Nikon p

TL;DR: If you’re coming from a Canon T7 and want pro-level autofocus without the $2,500+ price tag of a Z6 III or A7 IV, the Nikon Z5 II is the move. 1.Better "Brains" than Sony (The AF Argument) While Sony has historically led the AF game, the Z5 II inherited the EXPEED 7 processor from the flagshi

I had the same issue, that's the reason I sold my Z6, it simply wasn't sharp enough compared to my D810. I've been seeing this exact problem here on Reddit and other forums, many of the shots posted with Nikon mirrorless seem either out-of-focus or soft/mushy compared to DSLR. The crazy thing is eve

Bird detection af! The nikon z6iii is the only expeed 7 body that doesn't have it then.

The Z5ii is just about everything good about the Zf but with a body that makes sense for a general use photographer. That was always the thing about the Zf, with a BSI sensor and EXPEED7, it was far more capable than it needed to be to sell. So people whined about the ergonomis but it realistically

Nikon Zf i would only choose It, if the retrolook is a must for you, or if you are totally in LOVE of the design ... But on a daily basis or for long sesions i find new designs more confortable. Nikon Z6III ..similar Mpx and similar dinámic range as my Canon D6 bought in 2012 ...? ... I have the Z6,

Hey, since you're a beginner, I would advise you to go with Nikon. What I see people saying is repeating platitudes about Sony's "better af" but that is not useful by any means. Cause "af" is not a single parameter, plus: every system has different strong points for "getting a shot". Why I would adv

I have a Nikon Z8 and a Z6iii. Over the past year I have put about 100k impressions on the Z8 and about 10k on the Z6iii. I mostly shoot birds and other wildlife and almost always head out with a two lens set up and a camera body on each lens. My current kit consists of 70–200, 400 F45, 600 PF and 8

I have nikon and m43, can make the comparison between z6iii and g9ii. My experience is that the nikon autofocus for birds is not much better than lumix autofocus, and people seem to have an easier time with the OM1-2 for birds. I would assume the om1-2 has better bird AF than nikon, but I do not kno