Z6III FX-format Mirrorless Camera Body

TL;DR: If you’re coming from a Canon T7 and want pro-level autofocus without the $2,500+ price tag of a Z6 III or A7 IV, the Nikon Z5 II is the move. 1.Better "Brains" than Sony (The AF Argument) While Sony has historically led the AF game, the Z5 II inherited the EXPEED 7 processor from the flagshi

Bird detection af! The nikon z6iii is the only expeed 7 body that doesn't have it then.

The Z5ii is just about everything good about the Zf but with a body that makes sense for a general use photographer. That was always the thing about the Zf, with a BSI sensor and EXPEED7, it was far more capable than it needed to be to sell. So people whined about the ergonomis but it realistically

Hey, since you're a beginner, I would advise you to go with Nikon. What I see people saying is repeating platitudes about Sony's "better af" but that is not useful by any means. Cause "af" is not a single parameter, plus: every system has different strong points for "getting a shot". Why I would adv

I have a Nikon Z8 and a Z6iii. Over the past year I have put about 100k impressions on the Z8 and about 10k on the Z6iii. I mostly shoot birds and other wildlife and almost always head out with a two lens set up and a camera body on each lens. My current kit consists of 70–200, 400 F45, 600 PF and 8

I have nikon and m43, can make the comparison between z6iii and g9ii. My experience is that the nikon autofocus for birds is not much better than lumix autofocus, and people seem to have an easier time with the OM1-2 for birds. I would assume the om1-2 has better bird AF than nikon, but I do not kno

Yes the difference from the Z6III to the Z8 is enormous, assuming you would be taking advantage of those differences. The Z8 is a unicorn both in Nikon's current lineup and the current market environment, as it is unbelievably cheap relative to the competition (relatively speaking of course). Having

Is the Z6 III that far beyond Z6 II in autofocus? I've only used the Nikon Z5 and its continuous autofocus is dog shit. Thankfully I only use it for stills, but it's focus is reaaaaal clunky when you need to switch to mild action or people. Anyway, my point being, I always heard the Z6 II was quite

I'm an amateur dad in a similar situation (except with softball). Also a Nikon user, but I've moved to the Z6iii. I'll do my best to answer your questions, but take it with a grain of salt: I don't know about your camera in particular, but in a lot of situations I lock focus with subject detection (

The Nikon apologists are gonna came at you bro. but real talk the Z8 is better than the Z6iii when it comes to AF, and neither is that great.