Z f

Between just these camera bodies? Fuji. All my controls are within hands reach......and I like a more tactile feel and intentionality. 2) I use mainly apsc nikon bodies (d5500, d3400) and 35mm film cams with a 35 mm prime (now 85 for 2026). My main camera body is beginning to fail after probably an

I own both and use both as my only digi cams. the ZF is a lot bigger then the x100vi, add in a 24-120 and the difference is huge. They're just different cameras, the x100vi comes with me everywhere, is fun, comes to parties etc, I don't edit the photos off it. The Nikon ZF is huge, but comes with me

I have loads of old lenses for my film cameras. I have adapted them to my Fuji a few times. Tbh though, I ended up buying a Nikon Zf for this purpose. It's super annoying not getting the full field of view on these classic lenses without using speed boosters etc. Full frame is much better for this.

Way overhyped. I can't imagine paying 1800 dollars for a point and shoot that isnt a Leica. And even then it'd be unnecessary. I just bought a full frame mirror less Nikon Zf for about 200 bucks more and its 10x the camera that power shot is.

Q1: If you're just looking at lens resolution, this should be a fairly objective question you can look up. Q2: The D600, D610, D750, Z5 all use the Sony IMX128 sensor The D780, Z6, Z6ii, Z5ii, ZF all use the Sony IMX410 sensor The IMX128 is a slower, single-gain sensor, where the maximum DR (at full

Fuji is so overpriced compared to Canon or Nikon, their APS-C camera is literally selling the same price as Canon/Nikon full frame gears. The only advantage of Fuji is weight and retro look. But news is that Canon will introduce a retro style full frame camera this year too, if it can be smaller and

Jumped in on Fuji when the X-T2 was new because I got some advice from a friend who is a wedding photographer and he said if you’re going to buy an APS-C kit then go with a company who are all in on APS-C. Stayed with Fuji for years and years but I think after they scored a big hit with the X100v th

Why buy the 16mm 1.8? It’s massive and the same price as a used Fuji 16mm 1.4 This sounds a bit confusing you're making it sound like Fuji 16 1.4 is an alternative option on my Nikon Zf which of course it isn't. I switched to Nikon and so of course I need the full frame version for my Nikon. The 16

I moved from GFX as well. Files were great but even the GFX 100 II the autofocus wasn’t great. The other thing that bugged me was the 200mb raw file size. Constantly filling up cards and hard drives. Didn’t mind the lens selection but hated the native lens prices. $2.3k for a 55/1.7 is ridiculous. I

I shoot a D3s, I mention it a lot so my apologies to people that have seen my comments before. I bought it just the other year for 500 CAD, with a reasonable shutter count of 57,000. It has not let me down at all as I start doing my own freelance work. But I know for a fact, that once I start making