Z f

I had just placed my preorder yesterday for the new sand beige version, I think it looks great. I’m actually coming over from the Fujifilm system and the X-S10. I’ve been eyeing OM system for a while now, super intrigued by its compact form factor, IPX rated weather sealing, and computational featur

It’s the lens selection that has kept me away from Nikons zf. They have 2 smaller sized lenses. And the rest are all like big bricks. I had full frame before. And it was just too heavy. Full frame made more sense with the simpler lens designs. These days lenses have a lot more glass in them. I tried

It seems to me that Ricoh is going to let Pentax die without ever saying the brand is cancelled. I’ve heard before that is the way Japanese companies do this. Which is unfortunate, because we still don’t have a full frame DSLR the size of a classic analog SLR. Even the Nikon ZF is bigger and that is

Yeah I'm confused, having less grip makes it more usable? It's fine if you like the zf lots of people do, but it's definitely not smaller than most bodies these days. E: if Nikon gets a full frame sensor into the zfc body I will switch in a heartbeat btw

Hi, first, you ask the right person since i have used many system and cameras dating mostly from 1948 . There are several aspects that you mention that would lead to a very long answer but i will try to focus to some specifics. A- First, if we talk about AF, nothing beats a fifth generation Sony . T

I find it heavy after about an hour. There are other compact full frame options that are more comfortable like an a7cii if you really want full frame and travel. ZF needs a grip which adds weight around 100g and your lighter primes with the grip will be double your current set up. The z5ii has bette