Z f

Entry level DX lenses are not worth the price of the FTZ to adapt to full frame Z bodies. You'll be left with only 10MP on the Zf, technically an upgrade over your D40x but very wasteful. You could've got the Nikon 40 f/2 or multiple other Chinese Z mount lenses for that price. You're mis-allocating

It’s the lens selection that has kept me away from Nikons zf. They have 2 smaller sized lenses. And the rest are all like big bricks. I had full frame before. And it was just too heavy. Full frame made more sense with the simpler lens designs. These days lenses have a lot more glass in them. I tried

I'd say consider Z5II instead of ZF. For the lenses tamron 50-400 sound good but if you can afford nikon z 100-400 it's a great lens. In the wider end Z24-120s is one of the best options. And you already have great prime if it's a full frame compatible. If you can keep the Z50+50-250 for a while, it

Hi, first, you ask the right person since i have used many system and cameras dating mostly from 1948 . There are several aspects that you mention that would lead to a very long answer but i will try to focus to some specifics. A- First, if we talk about AF, nothing beats a fifth generation Sony . T

I find it heavy after about an hour. There are other compact full frame options that are more comfortable like an a7cii if you really want full frame and travel. ZF needs a grip which adds weight around 100g and your lighter primes with the grip will be double your current set up. The z5ii has bette