NV3

TLDR: Custa mais caro porque tem mais tecnologias que garantem mais durabilidade, mais performance instantânea e mais performance sustentada. A maioria das coisas geralmente mal se percebe, já que pra uso normal até mesmo os mais baratos funcionam bem. Vamos lá: NV3 costuma usar memórias NAND tipo Q

Nay, nay on the NV3. Once the good reviews came out for the NV3, Kingston started swapping controllers and NAND. The good ones were MLC, but the ones they are selling QLC now. There are six different version as of December. The accounting department meddling with the NV2 components resulted in some

Cara, eu pesquisei pra cacete sobre, e vou de SSD XPG gammix s70 blade 512gb, mais caro que Kingston NV3 e afins que tu encontra por ai, mas pelas minhas pesquisas, é o mais confiável e com melhor tecnologia

It's a Kingston A400. No surprise there. Kingston (as well as ADATA) has been well known for "bait and switch" tactics, ie releasing a new SSD model with decent components, waiting for good reviews to come out, then switching to crappier/slower/cheaper components without any obvious sign of a change

This should be a pretty well rounded build. You could go with a 2TB SSD instead of 1TB, or you can add another SSD or two when prices come down. My only suggestion there is to avoid Kingston NV2 and NV3. The initial reviews were pretty good for both models and then Kingston's accountants started swa

The 7600 and 7500f performance identical. I would personally get a motherboard with a better chiopset The a620 for example does not support pbo. The Kingston nv3 is trashy it's qlc which is known for becoming slow overtime. PCPartPicker Part List Type Item Price CPU AMD Ryzen 5 7500F 3.7 GHz 6-Core