LS50 Wireless II

I have both. One set of Beolab 8 in my bedroom and one set as rear speakers to my Beovision Theatre in the living room. The Kef LSX II is used as desktop speakers in my office. Like @matteventu wrote above, the Beolab 8 are more similar to LS 50 Wireless II than LSX. The Beolab 8 can play louder and

I've been through at least 10 different "audiophile" speaker systems over the decades. The best I've heard is what I have now - KEF LS50 Wireless II. So clean, clear, distinct, even over the spectrum of audio sound. Add a subwoofer, and you'll not want anything more. And they don't cost a fortune, l

I have the KEF LS50 Wireless II, with 1x KEF Kc62 sub (integrated with Dirac Live). Today coincidentally I had the chance of trying the Mofi SP8. Yeah it sounds warmer, less analytical than the KEFs, more like a “real sound”, wider soundstage and more 3D sounding (deeper soundstage especially). Real

Nice! I have some Kef LS50 Wireless II's (basically an active version of the LS50 Metas) and they're great, but agree... just a different experience. They're for my PC (which I spend a lot of time in front of) and replaced some Yamaha studio monitors, so they're accurate but I'm used to that. They'r

I don't believe it's quite so black and white as some suggest. At the lower end of the market, powered speakers are unbeatable in terms of price vs performance. You just can't buy a good stereo amp and a pair of passive speakers new for $150 that's really going to challenge a pair of Edifier R1280T

Had both R3 and LS50. To get the best out of R3, you need a serious amp way more than Wii M Ultra will provide. I have test amps between $900 all the way to $8000 for reference. Given this, LS50 Wireless II would he the best choice imo. Due to amp requirements for R3 to sound good. LS50 wireless off

KEFs website R3 meta: FREQUENCY RESPONSE (±3dB) 58Hz - 28kHz. Ls50 wireless ii: Frequency Response (±3dB) Measured at 85dB/1m 45 Hz – 28 kHz. Like I said over 10hz lower. DSP and lots of power > rectangular box with passive crossover. I have not spent time with both. I have ls50 wireless I bought ne

KEFs website R3 meta: FREQUENCY RESPONSE (±3dB) 58Hz - 28kHz. Ls50 wireless ii: Frequency Response (±3dB) Measured at 85dB/1m 45 Hz – 28 kHz. Like I said over 10hz lower. DSP and lots of power > rectangular box with passive crossover. I have not spent time with both. I have ls50 wireless I bought ne

I have both the LSX II's and the LS50 Wireless II's. I have used both with my TV (LG G5 65") Both types are perfectly fine with bass a-plenty for a small room, but if you want the best, opt for the LS50 Wireless II's, with a KC62 Subwoofer and the official stands. Edit: You could perhaps also consid

I also found my KEF LS50 wireless II more likable when I added a SVS SB3000. I love the minimalist setup, few wires. It’s always a joy to hear something so big and clear from such a small set up.