Forerunner 170

I think no one understands it. Now we have the cheetah pro with a small screen but almost the same dimensions as the ultra. They could have made them two different sizes like one in 44 other in 48 mm. I bet those custom cnc milled titanium pieces are expensive to manufacture, hence the price and pro

I never quite understand why Garmin is held up as the gold standard for long-term support. My previous watch was a Garmin Vivoactive 5, and from the moment I bought it, I barely received any feature updates. Look at the Vivoactive 6. Hardware-wise, it’s almost identical to the Vivoactive 5, but with

My Wife’s Pace 4 Aluminum and my Apex 4 both seem to be at least on par. My last Garmin was Epix 2 Pro and Forerunner 170. The Forerunner 170 extremely cheap and was too small for me. Even the regular all plastic Pace 4 felt to constructed better. Obviously the Fenix/Epix series has the metal back p

Garmin has some steep prices as well. For 350 (balance 3) the best you can get is a forerunner 265 which is no longer updated made out of plastic and has no maps nor flash, or you can get the forerunner 170 music with single band gps. For the 600 EUR price that’s a different category and probably wo

I just use Garmin! I have a forerunner 170 now. Used to have a forerunner 255. My 255 was on par with my calculated TDEE so I’m not sure if this one underestimates or my previous one overestimated. I think it’s either over/under estimating my calories burned during workouts.