Forerunner 170

I came from a Polar Pace Pro to Suunto in August last year. Polar forum was very pissed when I wrote a goodbye review about the old watch mentioning how the features offered didn't match the price for an otherwise decent watch...they actually were pretty hostile about it. Whatever. My experience wit

Slažem se s ranijim komentarom da ti ne treba nijedan sad da počneš. Pouch za mobitel je 6-7 eura Max i dobar je početak, pogotovo ako planiraš i uz sat nositi telefon na trčanje. Ako si baš odlučna oko sata i oko toga da bude Garmin, apsolutno ti ne treba ništa više od FR165. Ja bih ti samo preporu

Personally I would go for the Garmin between these two. The original Balance uses Amazfit's older sensor array which wasn't that accurate or great. Is there a reason why you won't consider the Balance 2? Also, look at the newly released Garmin Forerunner 170.

I think no one understands it. Now we have the cheetah pro with a small screen but almost the same dimensions as the ultra. They could have made them two different sizes like one in 44 other in 48 mm. I bet those custom cnc milled titanium pieces are expensive to manufacture, hence the price and pro

I went from Whoop to Garmin FR 170 also. I can understand your frustration. I switched because I was not convinced whoop is worth the steep cost for what I wanted out of a device. I swim, run, lift, and a few other activities. IMO, the FR 170 is far more useful for training. Yes, whoop UX is more po

Consider the Garmin Ecosystem if you want to expand your fitness activities later. I've tried quite a few of them but as soon as I expanded into rucking , running and needed a forerunner 170, Garmin Connect website that is able to tie in your load / activities from your cycling and running activitie

Als Multisportuhr habe ich die Garmin Vivoactive 5 Music. Glaube mittlerweile gibt es ein 6er Modell, das leicht verbessert wurde. Das wäre eine Option für dich. Wenn du primär läufst, wäre aktuell die Forerunner 170 Music sehr gut geeignet. Es ist ein Einsteigermodell laut Garmin, aber es hat dick

I never quite understand why Garmin is held up as the gold standard for long-term support. My previous watch was a Garmin Vivoactive 5, and from the moment I bought it, I barely received any feature updates. Look at the Vivoactive 6. Hardware-wise, it’s almost identical to the Vivoactive 5, but with

May I know which watch did you end up? I'm currently looking at Pace 4 and Garmin FR 170 but these insights of yours makes me lean towards FR 170 more.

I just got myself a Garmin Forerunner 170 and it is superior to my PW in every way tbh, 10 day battery life and in depth health analysis swayed me.