X-H2S

I have owned a camera from almost every system being produced but I always find myself drawn back to Olympus M43 cameras. I have a Fujifilm XH2S but I seem to prefer my Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark III, to the point that I'm seriously considering selling my Fuji kit to get an OM-1. It's so sad how Olympus

I own the Fujifilm X-H2S, GFX 50S II, and the Ricoh GR IV. In my opinion, Ricoh’s color science delivers a much more authentic 'film look' than Fuji. Since Ricoh doesn't market it as aggressively, people act like Fuji invented this whole aesthetic. If you’re shooting SOOC, Ricoh is the way to go. Yo

Uso Fuji e sou fã do sistema, mas o comentário das fotos mais parece um clamor aleatório de um fanboy do que qualquer outra coisa, lotado de meias verdades e subjetividade. "Tecnologia de coras insuperáveis", "câmera didática", "aprender fotografia de forma correta" (seja lá o que é isso), "lentes d

When I was looking for a lightweight birding camera, OM-1.1 and X-H2S were the cameras I was considering. I ended up with OM-1.1 because the 300/4.

I am a bird photographer and started with Fuji, worked my way up to an X-H2S/XF150-600 but then bailed due to weight and Fuji's never-ending autofocus problems. Switched to an OM-1/MZ100-400, both Mk II and have never been happier. I used to spend all my time worrying whether I would come back with

High-end crop sensor, i.e. north of $2,000 USD, is a hard sell. Even Fujifilm, the most successful crop sensor vendor, couldn't move X-H2 and X-H2S bodies when all of their other cameras were regularly out of stock. I also think Nikon was pretty successful in moving their higher-end DX DSLR customer

I'm still waiting for a damn stacked apsc sensor Fujifilm X-H2S

I use the xh2s and I’d say that the AF is plenty fast but not reliable enough like other systems. However, it greatly depends on what the user‘s requirements are (casual wildlife shooter vs pro). For casual wildlife shooters the Fujifilm system is more than enough. But for pro usage it won’t cut it.

I had the X-H2S with XF160-600 lens for birds/wildlife. One day I actually sprained my wrist picking it up "wrong", and that combined with Fuji's crappy autofocus had me looking for something lighter and better. 2 years later here I am with an OM-1/MZ100-400 (both Mk II) and I couldn't be happier. G

X-Trans ist besser geworden (Lightroom oder Capture One) es ist aber nicht auf dem Niveau der Bayer-Sensoren. Selbst in den Fuji eigenen JPEGs sieht man es. Fuji hat Probleme feine organische Strukturen aufzulösen. Besonders anfällig sind Grüntöne wie Bäume, Blätter, usw. Der Grund meines Systemwech