X-H2S

I am a bird photographer and started with Fuji, worked my way up to an X-H2S/XF150-600 but then bailed due to weight and Fuji's never-ending autofocus problems. Switched to an OM-1/MZ100-400, both Mk II and have never been happier. I used to spend all my time worrying whether I would come back with

I had the X-H2S with XF160-600 lens for birds/wildlife. One day I actually sprained my wrist picking it up "wrong", and that combined with Fuji's crappy autofocus had me looking for something lighter and better. 2 years later here I am with an OM-1/MZ100-400 (both Mk II) and I couldn't be happier. G

If I’m spending the money I really want the latest software, in long terms it will pay for itself i think. That's exactly the logic I used in getting the OM-1 Mark 2 rather than the much cheaper Mark 1, because I do bird photography so I need all the software help I can get! :-) And I have small han

I'll be frank with you. I've only been a bird (and occasionally other wildlife) photographer for 4 years (with another 50 years of other photography experience however), and I used a Fujifilm X-H2S with 70-300 and then moved up to a 150-600 lens. The autofocus was very spotty and the whole rig was t

I switched from a Fujifilm X-H2S / XF150-600 (their top of the line bird body and lens) to an OM-1 Mk 2 and MZ100-400 Mk 2. It's a world of difference for the better...lighter, cheaper, and far more keepers. The autofocus combined with the subject detection is amazing, especially compared to the Fuj

To crop a 48 megapixel sensor to 24 megapixels is about a 1.4x crop. Better served just getting an APS-C camera at 25 megapixels. Less weight. I previously used a Fujifilm X-H2S with their XF150-600 lens. Apart from the Fuji autofocus problems, that lens was really heavy and caused me physical distr