X-H2S

There were a few reasons why I didn’t get along with the X100VI, and why I returned it to keep the RX1R III, even though I have an X-H2S (soon to be replaced by an as yet unknown Sony). The first was the autofocus performance. My X-H2S is acceptable, if not Sony good, but the X100VI is only ok in AF

If I’m spending the money I really want the latest software, in long terms it will pay for itself i think. That's exactly the logic I used in getting the OM-1 Mark 2 rather than the much cheaper Mark 1, because I do bird photography so I need all the software help I can get! :-) And I have small han

Thanks. Looks like the 24-120/4 is a no-brainer for what I will use the camera for. I wish there was a slightly shorter FL version, say 24-100 or even 24-90 to save on bulk and weight. I too enjoyed my X-H1 better than my X-H2S. Fuji made some button and interface mistakes with the X-H2S, in my opin

I had a horrendous experience using an x-h2s because of the AF, i hadn't considered the system for video after that experience. The x100vi just has a 35mm prime, it's a tad limiting for the type of video's I do even if I can crop a lot, I don't believe I could go a full day of constant recording wit

In my experience, Sony tracking autofocus is as good as it gets. I went from Pentax film cameras to Canon EOS SLR’s and DSLR’s, then I sold everything and rented Sony and Canon mirrorless, but bought a Fujifilm X-H2S because I got a great deal on it. It was good - better than the Canon DSLR’s - but

I switched from a Fujifilm X-H2S / XF150-600 (their top of the line bird body and lens) to an OM-1 Mk 2 and MZ100-400 Mk 2. It's a world of difference for the better...lighter, cheaper, and far more keepers. The autofocus combined with the subject detection is amazing, especially compared to the Fuj