X-E3

And now for something completely different. Buy the best used M5 you can find and keep you sick one for parts. I’ve just gone through a a two month analysis paralysis over switching camera systems. My Fujifilm XE3 and I have never really bonded. I loaned it to my son for a couple of years and he did

I own two Leicas. Here's why I use them ranked by importance to me: the form factor. Yes you lose out on no AF. But a Leica body is so unbelievably sleek and thin that it doesn't really matter. Sometimes manually focusing that shot through an actual optical window on the camera just feels so right e

A fujifilm x-e3, as it has dials for manual control of shutter speed, aperture, iso, exposure compensation. It's also small, so it's great to carry in my pocket, with a second lens in another pocket. I used shoot dslr before that. I still do sometimes, as it is more versatile. But it's bulky. I love

I love my XE3 and I think it’s still a great value. 24 megapixels is enough, I’ve printed 20x30 photos no problem. And I don’t like the lack of switches on the xe4, in particular they removed the focus mode switch, so you can’t switch between single shot/continuous/manual focus modes without menu di

Hi, I have made the opposite switch (with some full frame time in between). Yes, Fujifilm cameras are great. I still have 3 of them. No, I don't think they are particuilarly better than MFT options. Worse, sometimes I feel like MFT is a simply better rounded sysyem, with small / cheap bodies that ha

"Landscape" is straightforward, most people would say any you just want a relatively wide lens on any camera body. "Pocketable" is where it gets hard, because small portable cameras mostly got replaced by phones. The Ricoh GRIII is probably the only truly pocketable option, but it's not cheap. Proba