GFX100S II

I have the Leica Q3 28 and the Fuji GFX 100S II... I have the 55 f/1.7, 45-100, and 20-35 lenses for the GFX. The GFX is so much heavier and slower. It's a beast. The 110 is a beast of a lens also, i think it's approx. the weight of the 45-100... it's something to lug around. The Q3 is relatively (r

If sensor size is a concern, the Hasselblad sensor is smaller than medium format but still larger than full frame, and that translates into more detail, dynamic range, and tonal range than the Q3 43. The images from both cameras are incredible, but the Hasselblad files are more true to life. The whi

I'm considering switching because I really like the look, user interface, and feel of the product. But I'm a geek, so I can't completely ignore the technical specifications, which is why I'm torn between the two systems. The Gfx 100rf is a joke. Seriously, I'm impressed that they made it so compact,

While I agree about them being a gem - a fujifilm GFX for a small start up business would be a nightmare to be honest. Especially for a woman. It's heavy. Like crazy heavy. I own one and if you're doing anything that requires you to carry this for the whole day, your back is gonna be screaming. Lens

And I’d only take the GFX 100S II out for landscapes when I’d have a car near me. If I was trekking and needed something with a variety of lenses, I’d take my SL3 or Z8.

My main point for the Hassy being better for landscapes really just comes down to an itty bitty better dynamic range, and I think that truly will be negligible if most if not all cases. If you would've said portraits, I'd say GFX for their 55mm and especially the 110mm. Only exception to that would