GFX100S II

I thought 'how close could it be' Turns out: really fucking close. Credit to u/Mysterious_Form5831Source A 65mm f/1.4 on GFX would be a 51.35mm f/1.1 on FF. So a Voigtlander 50mm f/1 should match this, but I honestly don't feel convinced it would have this rendering wide open, I'd have to give it a

There are many people making a living of Fuji and you can easily find them on the internet. Fujifilm places user experience first (something Pros often value less than, say, reliability or sheer AF performance) and uses APSC sensors for their x-series cameras, which many on the internet like to fram

If sensor size is a concern, the Hasselblad sensor is smaller than medium format but still larger than full frame, and that translates into more detail, dynamic range, and tonal range than the Q3 43. The images from both cameras are incredible, but the Hasselblad files are more true to life. The whi

I wish I could speak to your camera in particular, but I transitioned from about two decades on Canons to a GFX 100S II and had a very similar experience. I'm not out of the woods yet, but my pictures as of late are stunning, I almost can't believe I'm the one taking them. The first year was rough,

I bought the GFX 100S II last year after using Canon for a long time, and the transition was smoother than I expected. I have a couple of Fuji lenses but I also picked up a Fringer converter for Canon lenses and a Kipon adapter for Pentax 645. I don’t use them often, but it’s great to have those len

I'm considering switching because I really like the look, user interface, and feel of the product. But I'm a geek, so I can't completely ignore the technical specifications, which is why I'm torn between the two systems. The Gfx 100rf is a joke. Seriously, I'm impressed that they made it so compact,

The AF-C is impressive for Hasselblad, but Fujifilm's GFX 100 II still has better autofocus performance. I own a GFX 100 II (and an X2D) and have tested the X2D II against it; Fujifilm's GFX 100 Ii consistently outperforms the X2D II in most situations. The only time the X2D II beats the GFX 100 II

Fyi, fujifilm baru banget ngasih 'blueprint' protocol autofocus lensa mereka ke third party manufacturers, itupun cuma viltrox dan satu brand lagi dari Cina untuk series GFX. Jadi hampir semua lensa third-party Fujifilm selain Viltrox keluaran setahun yg lalu itu cuma hasil reverse engineering, dan

Hasselblad, Phase One, and Leaf made digital backs with square 36x36mm sensors. They are for medium format systems. Your best option for 35mm format lenses is a Fujifilm GFX camera. Nobody is making a camera with such a sensor today because it's niche, there isn't much interest, it's expensive to de

My main point for the Hassy being better for landscapes really just comes down to an itty bitty better dynamic range, and I think that truly will be negligible if most if not all cases. If you would've said portraits, I'd say GFX for their 55mm and especially the 110mm. Only exception to that would