Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Based on 166 Reddit mentions
$1999.00
We may earn a small commission.
Most discussed features
Sentiment summary across the product areas Reddit users mention most.
Reddit mentions
Original Reddit posts and comments behind this analysis.
Is the Z5ii really that good, or is it just all hype?
It's really that good. I don't own it, but I do own a Z6 III and a Zf and I've been following the Z5 II. Nikon took the tech in the Zf and stuck it in a modern body with a few tweaks here and there (like dual SD card slots rather than SD + mSD). But same sensor, same processor, same autofocus, same
...warm_vanilla_sugar in r/nikon_Zseries
October 26, 2025 6:58 PM
7
Canon user to Lumix S9
My wife went from being a Canon 15+ year user, got an S9 for an every day cam last year, really loved it and decided the cost of upgrading to RF glass (She had a R6 & R6II for wedding work) was way too much and now she's switched to a S1Rii and has upgraded her lenses for about half the cost. Do you
...math577 in r/LumixS9
April 29, 2026 12:41 PM
3
Recently switched from Canon to Nikon. Finally took pictures that weren't of my kids!
I had the R10 and wanted to upgrade to full frame. I didnt like the R8 and wasn't interested in buying the R6 mkII when the R6 MkIII was around the corner. Also the RF system being closed turned me off. Went Nikon because of the feature set the Z5ii had over Canon, and the lens selection was superio
...sinisterwanker in r/Nikon
November 6, 2025 4:35 AM
6
Dual system considerations (R6ii + S5ii) on a sports & wildlife / landscape & astro split
You maintain too many systems which will end up you spreading yourself too thin On Canon both 100-500 and 200-800 work great on R6ii. Canon tends to suck up your soul buying lenses On lumix, if you wanted one go straight for S1Rii: there are quite a few good lenses for any application there But if y
...oliverjohansson in r/Lumix
March 29, 2026 5:06 PM
2
Canon R6 II or Nikon Z6 III for portraits + travel,which camera to choose ?
If you are not married to a system like me, go for Nikon or Sony. I own the R6 Mark I and Mark II because I already have the EF 24-70 f/2.8L II and EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS III. If I had to start fresh, I would buy Sony or Nikon because they have great third-party lenses, which Canon does not allow.
Due-Concert4324 in r/AskPhotography
January 30, 2026 8:35 AM
1
What am I doing wrong?
This is one of the things that I've been in conflict with for a while now... One of the places I know for reviews and tips is YouTube, and every time I looked before getting my current setup there were people praising the Canon EF 100-400 mk II vs the RF 800mm f/11 or RF 100-400 because "muh best le
...xspiderdude in r/AskPhotography
July 24, 2025 5:10 PM
1
Camera Help- Sony A7 iv or Canon R6 mark ii
Everything but Canon is great, because of their ban of third-party lenses. Some very good concert lenses like Tamron 35-150 F2-2.8 are missing at all, available on Sony and Nikon only. Theroretically the Canon dual-pixel AF should be better in low-light than competition, but I compared my Sony with
...puppy2016 in r/concertphotography
April 8, 2026 2:59 PM
0