EOS R6 Mark II

The irony is that I had that exact complaint 12 years ago; I was running dance photography workshops as part of a (contemporary) dance festival I was running, and I’d hired a lot of cameras for participants. High ISO handling was featured with these Canon models, but I found I was having to use insa

Just dusted off my trusty Canon 5D3 for a shoot the other day and I like the pictures out of it better than my R6II. Exposure preview is nice and AF and video are better on mirrorless, but that doesn't mean the images are. I also used one battery to shoot all day. A camera is just a tool. Having a D

In my opinion it's a non-issue, and while it's visible in lab tests, you aren't likely to ever notice it in your real world photos. Stacked sensors (in this case partially stacked) pay a tiny DR penalty in return for faster readout speeds which for most people is going to be far more useful. If you

Это снято на Canon R6MkII. Но не надо фиксироваться на модели камеры. У меня есть подобные снимки сделанные на старенький Canon 1100d. И они не хуже этих. Уверен, что и на какие-то другие недорогие камеры можно такое снять.

I had the 100-400Lii and 24-105Lii on EF, I felt like I had to change lenses too much, I was always near the 105 and when I swapped, the 100 mm was slightly too much. One day a friend lent me his ef 70-200 2.8iii, I knew I was going to get it, I also really liked the internal zooming. I didn’t want

I have both substantial m43 and canon FF gear. OM1.2 150-600, 40-150F4, 12-40 2.8. 75 1.8 etc. R5.2 R6.1 200-800, EF 100-400 L mk II. 24-105L, several L primes and non L primes. I would take the Om1.2 over my R6 for just about everything other than razor thin DOF work. I’d take my R5.2 for everythin