Vertical 2

It's simply what the market wants. People are accustomed to AMOLED displays - they're coming from Apple/Google watches and they appreciate the visual quality, even if it means sacrificing battery life during sports activities. Most users aren't familiar with MIP technology, and when they encounter s

You're crazy, doing a review after running 80 miles! 😱🤪 Anyway Suunto has a confusing line of watches with a lot of overlap: Run, Race S, Race 2 and Vertical 2. If they had made the Vertical 2 with an improved MIPS display instead, things would be so much simpler and you'd get a watch with 90 hours

I just chose between the same two myself. I ended up going Coros. I think Coros has the better app. The Apex 4 46mm is smaller and around 20g lighter which is significant. While the Vertical has better battery life in GPS mode, the Apex 4 far surpasses it between activities - especially if you use a

I had a Suunto Ambit3 Peak which I have now upgraded to the Apex 4 42mm. I also asked the same question a few months back. I picked the Apex 4 because: Map navigation is better than the Suunto because the Suunto maps don't have trail names on them, Coros does. Suunto maps only allow trails visible u

BUT it doesn't look weird when I look at my iPhone, Apple Watch Ultra, or when I tried a Fenix 8. JUST the vertical 2. Sounds like Suunto hasn't addressed it as well as these other companies yet.