Alpha ZV-E10

Eu iria de S5 usada se você conseguir encontrar e não depender de auto foco, ou a S9 usada se você conseguir encontrar e precisar de um auto foco melhor; são duas câmeras com custo benefício muito bom, a S5 tem a imagem melhor que a S5II e a S9. Se estiver tendo dificuldade pra achar uma das duas, a

If you’re just sticking the camera on a tripod & having a wide shot with locked off focus - either camera will be fine technically. If you intend to follow the ball & zoom in etc, you’ll need PDAF so the lowest lumix would be a GH7, the m43 sensor will give good zoom capabilities for close ups at a

For bird photography, autofocus performance and lens reach matter more than anything. Between the Sony a6400 and ZV-E10, the a6400 is the better choice. The ZV-E10 is designed more for video and vlogging, and its autofocus and tracking are not as reliable for fast, small subjects like birds. Sony AP

Agreed, generally speaking, Sony is better in autofocus but the zve10 mark 1 is much older than the canon r50v. The AF algorithm is much much better in this canon than the Sony zve10. Now if we compare Sony bodies after 2023, of course the Sonys are better.

I've been browsing this sub for a few days now. I'm genuinely not trying to be a dick here but is the ZV E10 a low end amateur camera? Every part I've seen so far is barely focused or ultra soft.

Few points to note - Both ZV-E10 and X-M5 are video first cameras, and both lack EVF and IBIS. Instead of ZV-E10, I would prefer getting a Sony A6400. Sony has better auto tracking and more real life colours, whereas Fujifilm has better looking moody colours which I personally prefer. If you can ext

Take it from someone who used the first zv-e10, please don't get it. The Gh5 is an amazing camera, its KINDA small and KINDA light, and paired with a lens like the lumix/leica 13-35 2.8, you can get an incredible image. It doesn't have good auto focus, and you need good lighting. If you are not afra