Alpha a7R III A

Yes, it just tightens everything a little more in terms of image quality. I keep buying 16MP bodies, be it Olympus or Panasonic and I just end up selling it down the line. The tighter noise pattern, colour shifts, just a little more dynamic range surprisingly adds up. I quite like my OM-1. That said

they’re such great cameras i’m currently using a sony a7r iii rn and i really want a leica but they’re so expensive

Just left Sony for a S1Rii. I’m strictly a photographer. I started with Sony 10 years ago with a Walmart bought Sony. Then A6300 > A7riii>A7r4>A7CR. To me the pics out the camera on the Sony were too clinical had no Soul. Even using picture profiles. I’m blown away by the LUMIX. Sold all my Sony gea

I was just between a used canon R6/7 or Sony. I ended up with a used Sony a7r iii for $1200 with 6800 shutter count. In some ways the canons would be better. Certainly better autofocus. But really what did it for me was that with Sony I can afford to step up my lenses from entry level. And that will

Arguably the stepping up and still having sufficient resolution is possible also on Canon (R5 lines) and Nikon (Z7, z8, and Z9 lines) as with Sony (A7R and A1 lines). I agree Sony has a better APS-C lineup as that's the product of Sony's original commitment to APS-C all the way back to NEX camera. E