Alpha 7S III

Хрень это, на самом деле а не 108 мегапикселей. Просто маркетинг. На качество изображения в первую очередь влияет размер сенсора, размер пикселя на этом сенсоре, и сколько света он получает. Камера, на 10 мегапикселей, но у которой большой качественный сенсор, улавливающий много света - снимет чётче

More megapixels = more thirst for light Not really. Noise is almost entirely a function of how much light is collected by the whole sensors. Read noise only becomes relevant if the exposure is extremely small and in that context having more pixels tends to increase noisyness. Lot's of people make th

i ran into this same dilemma last year. sony typically announces new cameras in spring or fall, so waiting could be 6+ months. the fx3 is still a beast for cinema work and that 24-70 gm ii will hold value. if you need a camera now for your msc projects, just get it. the mark ii rumors are just specu

Submission Statement: I just put together a 3.5 hour ambient underwater film from dives in the Broughton Archipelago off northern Vancouver Island, and this is a short trailer from it. This was filmed over 7 dives across 3 days, totaling roughly 8 hours underwater, followed by about 20 hours of comp

Valid concern. That being said, the A7Siii was engineered with a reinforce copper heatsink which other cameras like the a6500 didn't have, Sony did this on purpose to prevent overheating. This meant the A7Siii tended to not have overheating issues. That being said for professional work I understand

So now you say that larger formats (when larger than 36 x 24mm) are a compromise. OK look, it sounds like you have some unrealistic expectations about real life. You use phrases like "are a compromise" as if a compromise can be avoided. There are always compromises, the only issue is which ones diff

There’s a leaked sensor roadmap floating around: https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1aff89b182d7fca65b4335b4502343666ef1e3ab66183a151e82381747129019.png The interesting thing is that it was leaked before the IMX820 (see chart) showed up. And that’s clearly the Nikon ZR sensor. So there’s reason to

There's a single light source on one side of the photo, but a diffused light source on the left – it could be an umbrella or a softbox. This is an overexposure photo; there are millions of tutorial videos about it on YouTube. I think placing a black piece of cardboard to the left of the object to cr

Yeah that's after downsampling, sensor itself is 48, click the link I sent What you listed is the final resolution, just like iphone used to advertise before they switch to the higher number, not the resolution of the physical sensor But yeah I get it, it's too hard to do that, you'd rather argue on