Alpha 7S III

Honestly yeah, I may try to adapt it to my Sony A7SIII that has insane lowlight iso. It would allow me to ramp up shutter speed.

Get an A7Siii used. Best deal by a mile. Especially if they toned down the noise reduction (not sure if they did this though). That higher second native ISO of 12,800 on the FX3, A7Siii, and ZVE1 makes a large difference. Between the FX30 and FX2 definitely grab the FX2, you can save money buy getti

I guess we'll agree to disagree for the most part. I get why you're skeptical. I just remember hearing in a CES interview or something of the sort Sony's explanation of why they didn't label many of their cameras as dual native ISO and it was due to them reserving that label for cameras that match t

I shoot A7s3 and FX3. Very robust. Best low light performance. Clean @ ISO 12800 can’t be beat especially with resolves noise reduction. If cost feels like an issue, Check out Sonys A6700, one of Sonys smaller hybrid bodies. The sensor will still feel larger than your Gh5, but comes in half the pric

Sony does have better low ISO performance on the FX3/A7s3 (12,800) vs. the R6m2 and it’s unofficial second base ISO at 3,200, but I think there’s trade offs to both R6m2 (& other mirrorless bodies) can also be used with an external cooling fan, this is how I use ours for 5-6hrs straight at 4k30 just

A7V is the mid tier with an amazing autofocus and 8000iso is pretty good. After that A7sIII but it’s 12mp “only”. If you’re using anything for web and social media the it’s plenty. Depending on the lenses you want or willing to invest, canon R1 seems to be the best at high ISO. R3 is the next best o