Alpha 7R V Full-frame Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera

There are a number of factors involved here but you can start with (I'll preface this with the fact I use both OM-1 & OM-3 and also the Sony A7r5 and A7Cii, and Nikon before that, however it's the OM-3 for me 95% of the time and I'm selling the A7r5 in the Summer). I will also mention that since I n

sony a7rv body - 289 т.р. Пожалуй останусь со своей старенькой зеркалкой canon

You can get the superb Olympus EM-1ii for less than the G9 or the even better EM1iii for slightly more. The PL 12-60 will still work well on them if you want it though the Oly 12-45/4 is a fabulous all rounder. I use the 12-40/2.8 v1 which is a superb lens and can be considered if the fixed f2.8 is

I sold my X-T5 and Fuji lenses and moved to Nikon like many others in this thread. But it wasn't straight-forward. I tried the Zf and wanted to love it, but hated the ergos. It is an entirely different feel from the X-T5 - significantly larger, heavier, and less grippy, even with an add-on grip. The

Shooting on a Sony A7r5 so definitely a real camera. Though I had more success doing this on my Nikon. I think what I need to do is try photo stacking since I'm not really intersted in getting a star tracker.

Excellent summation. I also use both Sony (A7r5) and OM (OM1 & OM3) and 95% of the time I pick up the cameras in the order = OM3, OM1, A7r5, A6000 (IR). People need to consider what they use their photos for (social media, forums, family, small prints (under say 100cms x 80cms) etc. even entering co

which 61MP sensor? the Sony sensor in the A7Rv is insanely slow and would never satisfy anyone buying a high end Nikon.

Marketing sheep/influencers think you should have an A7R V as a minimum these days and anything but Sony (and maybe Canon) is crap and tou might as well not bother because their "iPhone takes better pictures than that crap!" Yes I've been on the receiving end of that argument a whole bunch... Includ

I have 4 of your 'ideal M43 kit' and the 40-150/2.8 which is very bit as good as the 50-200 (check the head to head testing), the 17mm I don't need (as I love and prefer my favourite lens - the OM 20/1.4 Pro). That just leaves the 150-600 on your list ... and I'd take the 150-400 over that every day

I used a Sony a7r5 for the last 3 years photos were good but weird camera to use and digi techs hated them. Never saw or heard of Sony on set here in NYC, with their prices better off Nikon or canon with less quirks