Alpha 7R V Full-frame Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera

I have found that comparing iPhone pictures with dedicated camera pictures before editing and at low resolutions, the iPhone pictures often look better. The iPhone does a bunch of corrections to the photos to make them more pleasing, and I usually have to put the dedicated camera photos into Lightro

sony has the fastest autofocus on the planet and has backlit sensors to help with light - a7r v or a7 v would be good for you....I'd trade up to be honest (I just moved from sony to X2D v1 - though I do mostly landscapes and macro for a hash company so my needs are vastly different)

I read that often "the remaining millimeter will by feet" but that's not really true. As soon as you move, you change perspective (i.e. relationship between foreground and background). And often it is not possible to move (inside architecture, outside landscapes). But I am sure you know all that. Fo

OM has very devoted fans, and they tell a lot of things. Be careful. What OM definitely has is very cheap access to stacked sensors. This offers unique opportunities for macro photography. You can shoot with a flash with an electrionic shutter, and that's exactly how macro photographers do it. If yo

Sony and Lumix's Tilt / flip out is clearly the best of both worlds. It's in the a9iii, a1ii, a7rv, a7v for Sony, and the S1ii, S1Rii, S1iiE for Lumix. But that said, is it really worth switching for? Sony's closest offerings to the R5ii (that have the screen you want) are either slower and higher r

M11 highlight recovery is worth it if you shoot in fast paced, variable light conditions. I can pull back 2-3 stops of overexposure on the m11 while the m10 is blown out around 1+. High ISO images aren’t all created equally, quality of light makes a big difference. I reg shoot at iso 6400 and up and

Widest aperture possible, shutter speed of at least 250+ and ISO that properly exposes the image... or close to it. I shoot a lot of shows, and it does take practice. Your gear isn't helping you unfortunately. A full frame camera generally is better, and a telephoto lens helps too. At that distance

Same. It's output is good for its sensor size. Sometimes I'm disappointed but that's because I have a Sony a7rV too and I shouldn't expect the same quality haha. For a pocket camera for street walks it's fine. It's great for concerts and sporting events because of the zoom. Agree if OP doesn't need

Right! Sony A7R V is incredible. I usually do wildlife where the cropping is necessary.

There were a few reasons why I didn’t get along with the X100VI, and why I returned it to keep the RX1R III, even though I have an X-H2S (soon to be replaced by an as yet unknown Sony). The first was the autofocus performance. My X-H2S is acceptable, if not Sony good, but the X100VI is only ok in AF