Alpha 7C II

I found the a7c i to have pretty bad ergonomics compared to any canon camera. The a7c ii is much better but also more expensive. For me, I knew what lenses i wanted and knew they were on the RF eco system, so I didn’t really care, and really that is the main point Sony has above canon. 1.) rolling s

Some interesting perspectives from this photographer: I’ve been railing against this niche nuisance for years now. And I give Sony credit for at least starting to pay attention to it in 2023 with the A9 III, but it just isn’t doing enough. My A9 III feels slightly better to use than my original A1 t

I primary my Fuji, and dabble with Sony. Even though on paper my A7c II is a better camera then my XT-5 the Sony is just not nearly as fun to shoot with.

Oui c'est vrai, j'ai eu un Sony et j'étais sidéré par le rapidité de l'autofocus et sa précision. Par contre, j'ai été très déçu par les menus du boîtier (série A7C II) que j'ai trouvé complexe et illogique. J'ai revendu ce boîtier pour m'acheter un Leica SL2. J'avais déjà un Q2. Leica a, à mon sens

OM-3 and A7cII shooter here. The OM-3 is nowhere near Sony AF.

For Sony: APSC: FX30, A6700 and ZVE-10 II all share the same sensor and specs, differences are with ergonomics and oveheating risk as you go down. 18-105 is an awesome kit lens as it has oss, internal zoom and decent IQ, but there are plenty of faster, newer and better third party lenses available f

I sold my X100VI after buying the A7CII, but after using it a while sold it and bought an X-E5. I enjoy the X-E5 much more. Sony makes the set up and operation of a Fuji seem easy. Yes the AF on the sony is better but I don't find it a very usable camera. I might buy again Nikon or Canon some day, b

43 is small enough on K1 indeed. The motivation initially were 1. 43 is not small enough when i adapt it for Sony A7CII, so I wanna see how far it can go with this when adapted (apparently not as far as I wanted since adapter now is the big boy) 2. there's a custom image "Kyushu" (nine autumns) avai

There is no one best. If size matters most you already experienced the IIIx's size. Ricoh build quality isn't as good as Fuji. Both are higher priced for what they are. If you don't mind carrying at least a small bag then go Fuji, if you need pocket carry your only choice is GR. I've owned the IIIx

Don’t get a Fujifilm if you have kids, coming from a dad that just switched from an X-t50 and x100vi to a Sony A7C II then to a Nikon ZF (Sony was technically perfect, but didn’t feel fun to shoot).