a7R III

Yes, it just tightens everything a little more in terms of image quality. I keep buying 16MP bodies, be it Olympus or Panasonic and I just end up selling it down the line. The tighter noise pattern, colour shifts, just a little more dynamic range surprisingly adds up. I quite like my OM-1. That said

And while I'm complaining, I have the A7R3 and the A7R5. I bought the A7R3 first and loved it. When it was time to get a second body for dual camera usage, it made sense to get the A7R5, it would be almost the same, right? Well, the menu is a lot different(better), the video record button is in a di

I have a Sony a7R3 as well as an OM-1. I used to have the Sony 200-600 but I'm 70+ and it is too heavy. The M.Zuiko 300/4 Pro with a 2x tc stays on my OM-1.

Ergonomic. My dad have an old Nikon F1. I have also try Yashica film body. And when Canon release the first sub-$1000, EOS 300D (Rebel/Kiss) I tried it and I like the layout of it. And have stay w/ Canon EOS line since. I have also tried Sony A7R3. While the body is impressive, the ergonomic isn't a

Recommend Z7 II. https://cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-Z7-Mark-II-vs-Sony-Alpha-A7R-III

I probably need to try a few in my hand. I was wondering about the Sony A7r iii , but then saw the r8 which looks much more ergonomic, and as I’ve been a canon fanboy since the AE1 I thought it might be a good progression.

I'm kind of in your boat right now. I have an A7R III, and its just too large and complicated to use for everyday photography. I was looking at the Fujifilm X-M5 (900) with a Fujifilm 23mm f2.8, 35mm equivalent (450 but there's third party alternatives). it ends up being a bit smaller than the X100V