A7III

Yea, the jump from the a7III to the a7SIII and newer Sony FF mirrorless is a big one. Not just 10-bit color but also general color science and image rendering. The a7SIII sensor is what's in the FX6, though I know a lot of pros would rather use interframe codecs for everything, so XAVC S is definite

the best sports bargain in all brands is a used a9, i'd suggest finding one... set your a9 up for back-button af. one of the big problems with the a7iii is no sony real-time tracking subject selection, and of course slow sensor readout speed, so electronic shutter isn't much of an option: https://ww

There is a tiny HUGE difference between an A1 and an A7iii. well you opened that e-shutter door, and you still haven't explained why you think that nd filter is going to somehow fix whatever problem you think that e-shutter is creating. at any rate, i agree that using the a7iii electronic shutter fo

R and RP are trash. R is somewhat ok sensor-wise but it lacks modern AF. Get R8, it has very sweet used deals now. 1k will give you a camera and a nice control ring adapter. A7iii is bit dated and has terrible colors. And yeah, canon's new AF is absolutely superior.

For reference I use Lightroom Classic on an 18GB M3 Pro system processing 24MP files like the A7III's, and while editing, applying AI denoise etc, I do often see my system memory pressure graph go into the yellow, it never goes red indicating that the system actually needs more RAM. I do find that L

Sony is know in the industry for having the worst in camera look If you want something cinematic, well you get a cinema camera. Even a blackmagic pocket 4k would look far and above better then anything Sony has That being said, it's not as simple as swap bodies and calling it a day Sure, it sets you

Beautiful. Shame that the 120fps on the A7III is ready from 2020x1342 resolution