a7 III

Sony

a7 III

165 positive 4 neutral 40 negative

Based on 209 Reddit mentions

$1898.00

Buy on Amazon

We may earn a small commission.

Most discussed features

Sentiment summary across the product areas Reddit users mention most.

Reddit mentions

Original Reddit posts and comments behind this analysis.

Filtered by featurevalueClear feature

Is this a good deal and good starter camera?

Honestly for $700 I would skip that and get something mirrorless. Camera gear is something I think is wise to buy used, because when it's time to upgrade, you don't lose your ass. For your purposes, especially the low light activities, I'd say grab a Sony A7 ii ($500-700ish) or A7 iii body ($700-$10

...

740990929974739 in r/PhotographyAdvice

April 3, 2026 5:04 PM

31

Sony Cameras and Lenses Get Another Price Hike in the US

Yeah I hope the a7 iii doesn't jump up in price that much on the used market by November/December. I was really hoping to pick one up by then

psychoacer in r/photography

September 24, 2025 1:56 PM

23

Ouch there definitely is some people who dont like m43😅

On the topic of "Value for the money is not a reason anymore to get into m43": totally agree. My first camera was the Nikon D5300 DSLR (aps-c). Kit lens sucked, so I quickly added the Nikon 35mm F/1.8.This setup cost me in total €725 back in 2016. As a student, this was a huge purchase.However, the

...

beonfilms in r/M43

April 17, 2026 8:14 AM

7

Are Olympus PRO lenses better than FF third party ones?

The premium M43 glass, Olympus Pro line and Leica-branded Pansonic lenses, are pretty good overall, and were some of the first to show what you could really do with mirrorless lens design. Modern full-frame lenses have eaten into a lot of what was only possible in M43 a decade ago. The Olympus 12-10

...

human_performance in r/Nikon

March 19, 2026 5:15 PM

7

Micro Four Thirds is "just getting killed" - Peter Jeune, on Petapixel Podcast 12/06/2025

I actually listened to that, and I think the interview is really thought-provoking. Sony has "just done such a good job at telling the full-frame story" It’s true—Sony really pioneered the push to democratize full-frame with the A7 III. They were so good at convincing the general audience that full-

...

Karyose in r/M43

June 13, 2025 10:12 PM

13

Price of used OM-1 MK I 's are absurdly low / great bargain. Theories?

OM systems did absolutely shoot themselves in the foot by re-using old camera names that are still traded frequently in used spaces. This creates a lot of pointless confusion. Keep in mind that the OM-1, being a full-grip pro-body that appeals to more serious photographers who are expected to use he

...

Accomplished_Fun1847 in r/M43

May 11, 2025 7:23 AM

39

Genuinely impressed with my om5ii Vs a7iii photos.

Part of the problem is you didn't list focal length, ISO, shutter speed, etc., nor did you say how much of a crop each of those images is. Also the a7 III is six years older than the OM-5 II, so that's not the fairest comparison.

CydeWeys in r/M43

March 11, 2026 2:57 PM

6

Z5ii vs Sony A7iii

They all use the same sensor (Sony IMX410). Most 24MP full frame mirrorless cameras (other than Canons, the original Z5, and the latest models) use this same sensor. So the A7iii, Z6, Z6ii, ZF, Panasonic S5, etc. The A7iii is roughly equivalent to the original Z6. And you’ll note that the used Z6 pr

...

beatbox9 in r/nikon_Zseries

November 21, 2025 2:14 AM

7

Second hand A7iii - Is it worth it to pay more for less shutter count?

You can get a new A7 iii for around 1100. I wouldn't consider a second-hand one at those prices.

j0hnp0s in r/SonyA7iii

April 9, 2026 11:45 AM

4

A7iii - 50000 SC, for 490€, is it too much shutter count or worth it?

rainy_diary in r/SonyA7iii

March 31, 2026 11:15 AM

4

Top alternatives in Mirrorless Cameras

#1