a6700

RX100vii is still the most capable as of Spring 26. Best? Not easily answered. Ergonomically, it is a difficult camera to use - the APS-C (Sony, Fuji) are much better ergonomically and photo quality is similar. Price on the RX100, even used is ridiculous. No weather sealing. The viewfinder is barely

One thing that can bring you closer to the Fuji experience: use a lens with an aperture ring. That frees up the front and rear dials to be dedicated to shutter speed and ISO, which feels much more natural. That said, I made the jump from the XT3 to XT4 to XT5 and ultimately landed on the a6700, and

Out of these 2 I'd go for A6700. It's more compact, and it's got ergonomics that was not outdated 50 years ago. If it was me choosing I'd go for OM-5 with 12-45 if size really mattered or OM-1 with 12-40 if I could "afford" a little bigger and heavier setup.

Don't let glasses or EVF placement dissuade you from using the EVF. With either camera just get an add-on rubber eye cup and adjust the diopter for viewing through your glasses. The worst you'll deal with is a little nose tip smudge on your back display. EVFs exist for a reason. As for which camera,

Yes works fantastically well with any of the a6 series. Assuming you’re using this for wildlife, the biggest benefit you’d get by upgrading camera bodies is super sticky animal or bird eye af. Don’t listen to everyone that says upgrade body first. Glass is far more important than body with modern ca

I shot m43 for 10 years and now I shoot an A6700. The m43 cameras are more fun to use, but they have lost a lot of the compact market recently. The only thing that makes sense are kit lenses, the super tiny f1.7/1.8 primes and super teles. Faster primes, zooms and slower teles are smaller and better

I've gotten very good results (for the price) with an old Sony A6000 and an adapted Nikkor 500 f/8. The camera and lens set me back 400 total. It's what I carry when I know I'll be leaving my camera sitting in a car, Airbnb, etc. The only MAJOR downside is the lens is manual focus. The body's focus

I moved from a Fujifilm X100VI to a Sony A6700, no regrets! Autofocus is night and day better and I actually find the RAW files easier to edit for the look I want. Was never really into the whole recipes thing. I also found the X100VI uncomfortable in the hand and didn't want the added weight of an

Starting with question 2: Sigma's 18-50 f/2.8 is an amazing lens, I'd describe it as one of the best value options for any lens. I'd say that all of these are pretty easy to use, the a6400 maybe is a bit behind, it has a new autofocus generation that ended up being a revolution, but it's also a bit

I moved from Sony a6300 to Fuji xs20. Somehow i dont use fuji jpg styles at all, im used to raw processing (even if i set fuji styles in lightroom). I cant compare but im sure autofocus on 6700 will be better. Colors? Its personal matters, i heard that latest sony sensors are very good for editing a