FP L

the a7cr is the direct higher end version of the a7cii, buy for most people the sensor is probably overkill and the rest is the same. so for you a7cii might just be the best option. the canon r8 is cheaper, slightly lighter and arguably more ergonomic, they are pretty similar but the a7cii has ibis

i feel you on wanting something truly pocketable. the original bmpcc is small but still kinda chunky for a jacket pocket honestly. for actual pocketable size with log, check the sony zv-e10 - it has s-log and fits in large pockets. the canon g7x iii also shoots canon log and disappears in a jacket.

I liked S1/S1R form factor. Heavier but good grip and felt like tanks. Newer bodies feel like toys compared to them. I now have a Z8 and it feels quite close to S1 bodies - bigger and heavier. I prefer larger over smaller. They seem to balance better with larger lenses. At one point I also had Sigma

I would go with the Sony A7c; it's not as "film-camera-like" as Fuji but it's very small and full-frame, and almost every kind of lens can be adapted to it. I used Minolta lenses on my Sony cameras for years. The Fuji cameras are APS-C, which means your lenses will have a narrower angle of view. The

you're wrong on the 16mm XT2 vs 24mm S9 combo. The S9 is smaller and lighter. https://camerasize.com/compact/#922.951,679.571,ha,b yes that uses the 35mm which is slightly lighter and has it's hood on. I had this combo here in my hands before selling my fuji (XE4). Comparing lenses, I'm not using th

I mean he’s not wrong for that price. If you want to try m43 id just say you get a lumix lx100ii. Pretty hard to recommend interchangeable lens m43s nowadays knowing how portable your setup could be with an xe5, a7cr, sigma fp or fpl, lumix s9 (or even the silly sigma bf). Still, probably i’ll insta