LUMIX S9

The Sigma 20-200 both looks and feels stupid and unnatural on the S9 body specifically. For that reason I’d go with the Lumix 28-200, which feels “right”er. Here’s a pic with the S9 + Sigma 20-200 at full extension so you can see what I mean:

I'm sorry but I feel like Panasonic is helpless. They swing and miss with everything since the GX85. I love what they are trying to do but this leaves so many questions. I also love Emily's videos, but she is a content creator, she raves about a camera like the OM-3, then a couple weeks after her "1

I would go for the S5ii and the GX9 - my heart will always prefer M4/3 but I'm not convinced Panasonic feels the same, so the sensible thing to do is have a full frame system as well. The S5ii might not be as compact as the S9 but I still want a mechanical shutter on my camera.

I use my camera almost exclusively for family life. 10 bit video, reliable human tracking and good stabilization are the main things to look for in a hybrid dad cam. I wouldn’t recommend an OM-5 or GX9 for your use, because they both lack 2 out of the 3 things I mentioned above. I’ve owned an E-M10

That’s because the G100 has no relative value. Relative to the GX line it’s not meaningfully smaller, not cheaper at launch, and clearly less capable. If there was a GX99 and a G100 available to buy new at a similar price who would buy the G100? If you add an articulating screen (costs manufacture n

What Lumix really needs to make is a G9iii in an S9-size body. I don’t understand their logic of making big m43 bodies but small FF ones. Or just give us a full-featured G100ii.

I'm not a huge fan of the S9 body. It's more of a fashion accessory, and it's not even that small, all things considered (no EVF, no MSHTR - at least it's got IBIS). I would like to see the sensor in a G100 body - with IBIS. Probably not realistic though - both physically and considering how Panason

I've been dying for a another rangefinder style M43 camera. Seems like the Pen-F and the GX9 were the last ones they made and decided to just make more and more m43 video focused cameras. They just let FF and APS-Cs just take that entire class of cameras over. More recently with the Panansonic S9, X

Said it best. Being a dude without the will to carry a bag even if I run a small camera like the Panasonic S9 or x100vi, or even Ricoh GR I just prefer something pocketable in my jeans. If I have to bag it still, what's the point even if it's a smaller fix the lens body. And even backing it up to br

For me it would be a clear choce between the two kits: Fuji. It is weather sealed, has a viewfinder for sunny beach days and is an absolute joy to use. But I do mostly stills. The lumix S9 has also its place, but I don't find the lens/camera combo very appealing for a trip.