LUMIX S1H

S1ii and s5iix both better than the fx3 imo. Only thing the sony has better is autofocus. If Sony drops a fx6 mark ii I’ll buy that. Besides that it’s just hype. Most cameras are pretty much the same. I’ve shot against fx3 and fx6 with S1H and S1ii and the Panasonics look better right out the camera

The S9 feels like Panasonic’s shot at Fuji’s X100 VI, with a touch of Leica in its design. It is clearly aimed at people who are new to the Panasonic S line, at travelers who want something light, at street photographers who need discretion, and at influencers who want portability without losing qua

Not sure how you think the S9 has better low light performance than the other two. They're all in the same ballpark. Don't buy into the myth about megapixels. A 61MP FF is better than a 12 MP in low light when it comes to photos. https://youtu.be/gAYXFwBsKQ0?si=eN7HTxr5Hg-0xKN6 Same with video. High

I’ve had this exact dilemma and the way out was to choose by job demands, not specs alone. For weddings, I’d prioritize AF reliability and shoulder carry weight, so Panasonic Lumix S5 II X usually wins for long shooting days. Panasonic Lumix S1H still makes sense when budget and scene control justif