LUMIX GH7

If you have a limited budget, MFT can be great. Used G9 is great value. If you have money to spend, I see almost no reason to buy into MFT at this point for video. Higher frame rates and less overheating are really the only considerations and most people don’t need to worry about either of those. Pa

The same limitations of small sensors—poor low-light, depth of field is way deeper than on larger sensors. I don’t like MFT glass in general, which means manual glass, which begs the question why you would purchase cinema glass for MFT. Apparently the GH7 has decent autofocus, but there has been no

i think i could answer this down to the exact situation you're in. my dad used to shoot oly and had two old 4/3 lenses left for me when i started, that same 14-50 you have, and an oly 12-35 f/2. he bought me a gh7 for my birthday and suggested the idea of adapting his grails of 4/3 lenses onto my mf

Exactly. The huge appeal of micro four-thirds early on was that you had a choice between SLR-style bodies and more compact rangefinder-style bodies with a corner viewfinder. Today, the only current lines still being refreshed: the Panasonic GH (GH7 = $1800 [prices new, body only on B&H]) and G optio