OM-D E-M1X

They’re mostly all the same. Just get whichever one you want and stick with it forever. I’d probably avoid the cheapest Canons and cheapest Sony’s. The Nikon 50-250mm is a very good lens considering what it is. They also have a cheap but also very good 12-28mm The cheapest Canons like the R100 nerf

The answer to that question isn't quite as easy as one might think. The OM-1 would likely be the right answer for many people, but it depends on how you do your macro. If want to do a lot of single shot images of less-than-cooperative insects, the OM-1 has a leg up. Its AF system is generally faster

Yeah, i hope all the older brothers olympus and lumix got fully compatibility, aka IS lens options in both cameras, aperture rings and i think nothing else 😅 with olympus 100-400, 12-100 and 300 f4 i cannot turn off the lens IS switch on the GH6-GH7 without turning off all ibis options, or the same

I used to own those lenses and ran them on an E-M1X and E-M1mkII. The size is great, but the performance per dollar isn’t there. The Oly 7-14 is good, the Nikon 12-28 is better. The 12-40 is fine, but at f/11 for landscapes, not much different over the 16-50 kit lens (or the Panasonic 12-32) and the

I don’t doubt that but when it comes to the E-M1x it’s used price is at least to me significantly less appealing (tends to go for about $1200 the few listings that pop up around here), the leap to a newer OM body is not huge (especially not if you go used, like OM-1 Mk i or so)