OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Of those the E-M1 ii is by far the best camera, and also probably the best bang for the buck. It is Olympus's professional body, so if that feels too big, the E-M5 iii is still an excellent choice. The E-M10 iii is a distant third place. It didn't get the upgrades that the other two got until the Ma

Senior Vice President Tazuhiro Togashi and Director of Product Planning Hiroki Koyama Not exactly "OM Reps". That suggests some low grade Marketoid. These "dudes" are "nosebleeder" - called that because they are so high up in the company, the thin air up there could cause nosebleeds. So these statem

I would recommend a sony a6000 for around that budget. The camera alone should cost around $350 used. With the rest of the budget you could get a nice prime lens or even two if you're wise spending it. The 16-50mm kit lens cost less than $100 but i would really not recommend it and instead get a pri

None of those cameras are worth the premium they're charging for now. There's a range of compact Olympus body you can get on MPB for "Like New" condition for under $400, like the E-M10 III or the E-PL7. You can pair either with the 14-42 PZ zoom lens. That'll be a way better value for money combo an

You just need a more lightweight camera that'll produce good jpegs, and buy some Lightroom presets that you can apply to your photos after. https://www.mpb.com/en-eu/product/olympus-om-d-e-m10-mark-iii/sku-3280484 https://www.mpb.com/en-eu/product/olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-14-42mm-f-3-5-5-6-ez/sku-

Here’s my current setup and journey: I recently started getting into wildlife photography more seriously and wanted to share my current gear and experience. Main camera:Sony A7 Mark II (bought second-hand on Ricardo at a decent price)Originally used it mainly for street photography, but now I’m usin

Hey, in my opinion the OM-5ii isn't worth it at the current price. It's a good camera, but the difference with other OM / Olympus bodies is going to be extremely small, besides maybe the new menu system. I would look for a used OM-5, it's basically the exact same camera but with the older body from

The kodaks have a small sensor but larger zoom range. An interchangeable lens camera will not match the range of focal lengths but might offer better images under more varied conditions. For that budget an older Mirrorless or DSLR will work. Not new but you take what you can find really. https://www

Se non fotografi a scopo professionale non credo tu abbia bisogno di una full frame come prima fotocamera, gli obiettivi tendono a essere costosi e pesanti. Una micro quattro terzi dovrebbe soddisfare le tue esigenze essendo leggera e con un sacco di ottiche economiche disponibili, io andrei per una

I wanted to sell a laptop and stumbled on a marketplace listing for an OMD EM10IIIs and guy was open to trades for laptops with specs mine had. Just this past weekend I went on a hike with my EM10 and a 45-150 and also had my Lumix S1 with 24-70. Which really made me think for long haul hikes having