ZR

A Nikon Z-SP, new line of compact lenses, rangefinder/EVF like the 100 but more glass and more bright, very rugged.An upgraded Zr but photocentric.

Blackmagic 6K FF, 6K Pro pros: Better color science, BRAW. 6k pro has built in ND's. 6K FF has beta AF. Blackmagic cons: battery life, heavier, no autofocus (6k pro), low light. Sony FX3 Pros: lightweight, battery life, autofocus, low light king. Sony FX3 Cons: No in-body RAW, color science. Nikon Z

As I’m sure you’re well aware from your own research, there is no wrong choice here. I know that doesn’t exactly help your analysis paralysis, but in regard to solo filmmaking both the R6V and the ZR are fantastic - there is no “better tool” between the two. If you’re asking me, the value propositio

If we are just talking about bodies, the Canon is the best in my opinion. As a Nikon shooter myself, I am not a big fan of the ZR. What is great about Nikon is that you cam adapt everything to it, even Sony lenses. I would not bux an FX3 to be honest. I think its a solid camera but its incredibly ov

It’s the best value at the price. The only “cons” I see are Z mount and no open gate. Micro HDMI is a head scratcher choice. But those are nitpicks Otherwise everything else for that price point is unbeatable. The only reason I’d take a BMCC 6K over it (whilst BMCC6K costs more) is for open gate, L

Nikon ZR old Nikon Nikkor AI-S lenses is a match made in heaven.

The Nikon ZR does not have open gate as of now. The camera is absolutely meant as a raw camera, especially the r3d raw ne. If you want to use this camera as your main camera, you have to know what you're getting into. Your list of cameras you are currently using makes it seem that your clients reall

So the FX3 isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Even if a new version is announced in December it’s not like the FX3 is suddenly obsolete. We have hit a plateau in terms of quality, the iPhone and smartphones have changed the way people shoot and watch video. In the past a new camera would be leaps an

I've been in the market for a FX3 upgrade for a while now. Honestly the Nikon ZR is looking like a better deal. Internal RAW, open gate, and I can still use my Sony glass? And it's cheaper? And it will have better low light than the a7V? And the FX3 mark II isn't even on the horizon? The only reason

Having used an s9 and S5iix for over a year and having switched now to a Nikon setup with ZR/Z8/ZF I can only say I am more happy with current gear BUT for your needs, an S9 it’s the best bang for the bucks you can have. Yes, crop on 4k60 it’s a pain in the arse but noting that will make you rip you