Z6

This is the part I strongly disagree with. The difference is keeper rate and expectations. With a modern higher end mirrorless like Sony a7v Nikon Z6III or something, even a beginner can get like a 40% keeper rate, and a moderately skilled amateur can get into like 70% rate. But if you're shooting a

For amateur birding, I've got an OM-D E-M1 Mk II with the 75-300 II (and the 60mm macro for smaller critters handheld macros without a tripod are pure bliss). Before, I was a compulsive buyer: Nikon FF, Z-mount, Canon... tested and sold it all. Since switching to Olympus, no urge to change,lightweig

The difference IMHO is overblown for all but professionals, your skill, luck, good lighting and good lenses will be more important than sensor size. The potential niggle could be astro, but I haven't found any critical issues with noise on my Z50 (same sensor as Z50ii) that makes me want to rush out

I went from canon to Nikon (with the z6) and found it incredibly bad from the autofocus standpoint and way too little sharp. Sold it and bought the a7iii, I really liked the cheap third party lenses and kept on shooting w it for three years. Then I sold once I felt phography wasn’t about passion any

Aha that's something I've been wondering. is the AF that bad? Other mirrorless cameras I've looked at were the canon eos r and Sony a6400 (a7iii is way out of my budget lens included) and I've heard the z6 is kinda poor in AF (which I find weird, since many wildlife photographers use Nikon but what