Z50

I can't speak for the Canon; I shoot full frame Z bodies, 80-90% corporate/industrial video and some corporate stills/product shoots. The little Z50ii is my little gimbal monster though - it punches way above its weight/price. Nikon simply didn't cripple the thing in any meaningful way. It lacks in-

Nearly 3 years ago I switched to Sony A7iii from a Nikon z50. The reasons were many, but mostly that there were no affordable fast zooms, be it 1st or 3rd party.

Now things have changed, and the Z mount has not only great native glass, but also some of my favorites from E mount. Unfortunately, Son

Hi guys. I’ve been jumping around the bush for months deciding which camera should I choose for my first camera between fujifilm xm5 and Nikon z50 ii.

I am new to camera, but I have some basic understanding of camera.

My goal is to use it for 50% photography and 50% videography. I am not planning

I know this is a M4/3 sub, but if your wife had a Canon that she loved, she might prefer to ease back in with a Canon. I took a long break from photography and got back into it with a Nikon z50 2 lens kit, and it let me get familiar with a new version of a system I was comfortable with. Now I have a

I was taking pictures before but this is truly the first camera I can call my own. Nikon had a discount on this bundle, so I got it new for around 780$. Super excited to go and take pictures!

Hey everyone! I could really use some help deciding my next upgrade move.

I currently own a Nikon Z50 II (about 1 year now) and some extra accessories for DX:

Filters: CPL / ND / Black mist

2x extra batteries

Lenses: TTArtisan 10mm ultrawide + 50-250mm z kit

SmallRig baseplate K&F 4l sling b

No, in normal shooting cases in good lighting with people who know how to use the cameras, you won't be able to know which shots are from either sensor without looking for clues, like resolution, EXIF data etc. Some here will violently disagree with that statement and some "professionals" will tell

Nikon doesn't seem to restrict mount access very much, at least not nearly as much as people seem to think, it's most likely that they set a licensing price for certain lenses that is above what Sigma and Tamron are willing to pay, and also Z mount reportedly has a much higher development cost as it

I doubt you'll save much money, thanks to the existence of lenses like the 70-180 f/2.8 and the like. For me, the rubric for adapting a lens to a DX camera is: At least $100 cheaper than getting a native lens (otherwise why get a $300 adapter to make a big unwieldy package) Be size appropriate, as a

Von denen, DEFINITIV R7 + 100-400. Ziemlich ordentliche Kamera und wiegt nicht viel. Die P950 ist eher für Beweisfotos bei gutem Licht. Wenn du eher in Wäldern oder anderweitig bei wenig Licht unterwegs bist, kannst du dir auch die Sony A6700 + 70-350 anschauen. Die ist sogar minimal leichter und ko