Z50 II

Nikon Z50 II and with an FTZ ... Nikkor 18-140 mm f/3.5-5.6, Nikkor 70-300 mm f/4.5-6.3, Nikkor 50 mm f/1.8G, Tokina 10-20 mm f/2.8G I mean, you can do that, but I wouldn't. Simply put, the new 16-50, 18-140, 50-250, and all wide angle options put the older F-mount lenses to shame. An FTZ is an expe

Nikon Z50 II is lightweight & compact and so are the kit lenses. Unfortunately, there are very few professional and semi-professional grade lenses. What's more, the body relies on the built-in touch display for a number of interactions, which can quickly become an issue. Especially if it's below 0 C

I live in raw so I can’t speak to picture profiles. The only one I use is sometimes I’ll shoot in monochrome, which is delightful. I do have the 1.4 VL lenses the 23 and the 33. And while they are both very nice, they are too heavy for the small body in my humble opinion. The auto focus as you proba

I have a Z50 i (not ii) and it's awful for wildlife, the rolling shutter in silent shooting, and autofocus on moving subjects, are terrible. I doubt the Z50 ii is markedly better. You should hold out for one of the higher-end Z bodies.

It's definitely not "much better".it's also using a sensor from 2019 and lower res than Sony. Image & AF**:** Sony A6400 wins : sharper pics, faster autofocus, and better low light. Video : Nikon Z50 II is newer, has 4K 60 Battery**:** Sony lasts longer