Z5 II

Given the increased presence of full-frame in the midrange, it’s given me second thoughts on whether investing in APS-C is still worth it. My R7 plus this Sigma 17-40 F/1.8 is close to the price of a Nikon Z5 II plus a Tamron 28-75 F/2.8. That’s a precarious situation to be in if you’re a APS-C enth

I have the same camera and was thinking about the tamron 50-300 with etz adapter. (700€ + 100€) Alternatively the much bigger Tamron 50-400 (1000€) Keep in mind that the Z50 doesn't have IBIS, so you need a lens with stabilization . Kit Nikon DX 50-250 might also be an option, but in my experience i

Thanks everyone for their feedback. Everything I've read up until now has given me the impression that I would get better performance with full frame, which is why I purchased the Z5 ii. However, given these comments, I will be reaching out to Nikon to set up a return. Haven't even gotten it yet, bu