Z5 II

I shoot mainly with the Nikon Receipts my portraits. The JPEGs out of cam are so great that it reduce my editing time. I still made some adjustment in lightroom, but based on the JPEG instead of the RAW files. Color and sharpness is great with the Full Frame Nikons. I use a Z5II

I’m not familiar with Fuji, but I’ve been a lifetime Nikon user and just got the Z5 ii. It’s great so far, I’m super happy with how my photos have come out. I’ve been focusing on landscapes a lot recently. I got the Nikkor Z 24-120 F4 and a Viltrox 14mm F/4. Both are great for travel and it’s just a

I have the Z50ii with the 16-50 kit lens (not the f/2.8 lens that you are thinking about). I also have the Z6iii with the 24-120. Here is my take: For a lightweight and portable kit you can't beat the Z50ii + 16-50 f/2.8 combo (825g vs 1,250g of the Z5ii + 24-120. As for low light performance, there

I've never handled a Z50 ii. I have a Z6 iii. It was kind of surprising to me that the Z50 ii and the Z5 ii both have most of the features of my more expensive Z6 iii. Nikon didn't cripple it's capabilities, they only left out a few things due to the camera's hardware differences. ~~~ The answer is:

I would go Z6iii. Yea the 5ii is a very good value, but the 6iii has a better viewfinder, battery life, the little info window on top which I’ve found mandatory for my cameras, higher shutter speed. Etc. check it out here: https://photographylife.com/comparison/nikon-z5-ii-vs-nikon-z6-iii

Instead of buying a new camera, why not look at some wider-angle lenses for your Z50 II? I've seen some good reviews of the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/2.8. Tamron has also just announced the 17-70mm f/2.8 for Z mount. Viltrox, TTArtisan, and 7Artisans also make several wide-angle APS-C lenses for the Z mo

I moved from Z50 II to Z5 II. I value IBIS more. My other cameras have IBIS and I couldn't go back to a body without IBIS. As for the size, with 40mm, 28mm and 75mm primes the Z5 II isn't that big of a camera. AF performance is a wash between two. Lens selection for Z DX is pretty small and no prime

https://www.dpreview.com/image-comparison/?attr15=Jpeg&attr16=100&attr18=Daylight&normalization=compare&attr13_0=182376&attr15_0=Raw&attr16_0=3200&attr13_1=182446&attr15_1=Raw&attr16_1=3200&attr13_2=0&attr15_2=Raw&attr13_3=0&attr15_3=Raw&x=-0.040701588518448927&y=0.3264529521260094&widget=1 Excuse the long li

Nikon Z5ii with Nikkor 24-120 F/4 Z mount lens. Thats all you need. If saving money, can also look at Z5 since you are into landscape and architecture so don't need wildlife fast autofocus.

Imho if you’re planning to build your gear practically from scratch, it’s already worth looking into something from a mirrorless system. Even the Nikon Z5 or the Nikon Z5 II would be a better choice for this kind of work. The practicality of a lighter body and better autofocus systems will give you