SL2-S

I mean, buy a LUMIX S1 for 1/4 the price. Get the M. For near the cost of an SL2S you could get a Q 116 and an S1. Or get the M10 over the M240 + S1. If the M is for joy and the SL2-S is just for getting stuff done, why waste extra money on it to get the same thing? Totally get the Leica is a nicer

sell it and never come back to it.I had Leica M10, M10R, Q, Q2, Q3, Q343 and SL2S (x2) and never even close they were up to performance of X1D II, I am not even going to compare them with X2D II. I wish I was smarter and never even tried Leica, they are same full frame as other manufacturers with di

After almost 3 years with SL2S - I decided to abandon Leica and SL series, by the looks of Leica strategy - they are pumping raw cameras into the market and milk customers. SL3P should have been SL3 initially, but we got undercooked camera

Leica M9 is the best Leica ever made. But only if you know how to live with it. Otherwise, 98% of your shots will end up in the trash. It also has the sensor corrosion issue. It can be fixed, but it's expensive. If you know exactly why you want an M9 and you know how to deal with its flaws, it's the