RP-600M Mk2

Wharfedale all the way . I own the Klipsch RP 600m II and I hated them. Absolutely hated the boosted highs and scooped out mids. No warmth or details. Just screechy highs. I bought the Lintons and I’ve never been happier.

Here's the on axis frequency response: https://www.spinorama.org/compare.html?speaker0=Klipsch+RP-600M&origin0=ASR&version0=asr&measurement=On+Axis&speaker1=KEF+Q11+Meta&origin1=ErinsAudioCorner&version1=eac The estimated in room response - the bass in every room is going to be different: https://ww

There is no RP-600F. There are RP-600M, RP-600M II, RP-6000F, RP-6000F II, etc.. OP means this Klipsch R-600F. Not something I would recommend. It is from their entry level series. (The RP are “somewhat” OK-ish, if you like elevated treble etc.. But Reference series is probably just bad.)

The subwoofer is fine. But the speakers are either questionable, or down to your personal preferences: EAC review of Klipsch RP-600M.

I wouldn’t send it back as I live in EU, too much hassle. I preferred the sound of Serenade over built in Ultras DAC so theres that. And I run Klipsch RP-600M II which are bright by nature.

zero argument from me that the speakers are the weak point in the chain, the only reason I would be upgrading this cartridge before is because I figured I could order it the same time I upgrade the stylus on my main turntable zip code is 49203 so I have the benefit of both Lansing & Ann Arbor being

Klipsch RP-500M and RP-600M seem popular here, but there are mixed opinions. Audiophiles mostly against. They’re a good size for small and medium rooms, but they’re sort of forward and punchy. It’s like midrange down, bass and treble up.