R3 Meta

Your impressions of the KEF match mine. Comparing the R3 Meta to the Sourcepoint 8, the SP8 immediately proved to be superior in natural timbre, a richness to the midrange, and a little weight to the mid bass. I preferred it substantially, and the imaging between the two seemed comparable, so the KE

I have different experience. I had Enyo 15th for a few days connected to Hegel H120 -> KEF R3 Meta and I was dissapointed. It was more smooth and had deeper soundstage but it sacrificed a lot of details and dynamic comparing to Hegel DAC. It was just boring. I do like much more Mojo 2 as a DAC which

I have had a complete timbre matched Klipsch reference premiere 7.2.4 system. For my ears, timbre matching atmos speakers is not worth it. But if you want to spend $2.5k for the r3 meta for surrounds and $3.6k for 2 pairs of the kef r atmos speakers it’s your money and your system.

I find the KEF R series to be good, but quite overhyped on the forums, usually because of their good measurements. They resolve to a point, and then you would have to go upstream, KEF or otherwise. I had the R3 Meta in house for a little, and they just couldn't hold their own against my (then) curre

What did you not like about the cinema 40 and kef r3 metas? I have the same setup and just bought the r3 metas and I'm finding them a little sharp, almost too accurate. I thought the cinema 40 would tame this but I'm now considering the Parasound A31 however I'm not really convinced the amp will mak

Do you have these set with a crossover? I wouldn't be pushing them that hard personally. Edit: People are downvoting but the fact is that the Kef R3 Meta should absolutely be cut off at 60 or 80hz at these sort of volumes. It's not a subwoofer and it's not designed for sub-bass frequencies. If you d