Q350

Maybe you just don’t like uncolored sound, which is completely reasonable. Kef has a under 0,5 percent return rate on their Uni-Qs (the lead engineer at least claims so). Most speakers are damaged because people expect a Q350 or ls50 meta whixh don’t have a dedicated bass driver to play bass at high

Without much to compare them to that I've personally heard - they sound amazing. Previously I had a pair of KEF Q350 bookshelf speakers, which were great, but the room the stereo lives in is quite large and they just seemed to lack. I'm a little skeptical about the top face around the tweeter/mid ra

You're right. All KEF speakers need 4-ohm stable amplification, and any that rely solely on a single Uni-Q driver for full-range (Q150/Q1 Meta, Q350/Q3 Meta, LS50/LS50 Meta) for anything other than nearfield listening must be used with a subwoofer and high-passed to protect them from low frequencies

There is a statement of jack-oclee brown the head of engeneering in Kef which states that they have a less than 0,0x return rate on their Uni Q drivers. The main reason you see these pictures is that people expect full range sound from the LS50 and Q150/350 Series whixh dont have a dedicated bass dr

I recently got a pair of Kef Q350 speakers and was very happy with their bass (big upgrade from my previous speakers). But when I integrated my new (to me) SVS SB-2000 Pro it added such an amazing depth and richness to the sound. Turning the sub on and off is like switching between skim milk and who

I think "max SPL" just means power handling before the speaker is damaged. Both speakers will have significant bass compression and distortion long before that point. Erin's Audio Corner does compression measurements, but he hasn't tested the Q350 or Q1. Here's the Q150:https://dl.dropboxusercontent