Q3 Meta

Check out https://www.spinorama.org/scores.html?quality=High&sort=score&count=1000. There you can find all you need. KEF Q1 MetaTonality: 5.5Bass extension: 47 HzFlatness: ±2.3 dB KEF Q3 MetaTonality: 5.0Bass extension: 38 HzFlatness: ±5.0 dB As you can see, the Q1 has better tonality score and has

Indeed...there seems to be some dip in the 700Hz to 1kHz region in the Q3 Meta for the on-axis response too. I guess the Q3 might sound a bit more darker than Q1 in that range. Some people might like it. Some people might not. https://www.spinorama.org/compare.html?speaker0=KEF+Q1+Meta&origin0=Vendo

So, despite what the specs imply, the Polk R200s will require twice the power of any of the other listed speakers. The KEF Q3 Metas demand a 4-ohm stable amp, and have less bass than most of the other listed speakers. The Monitor Audio Silver 50 G6 is a great speaker, but is overpriced in my book. T

You're right. My bad, not the R3 meta but the Q3 Meta I checked. So my experience with the KEF sounding muffled is with the Q3 Meta, not sure how much the KEF R3 difference to the Q3. My main point of criticism to the Q3 was the absence of any good lows, so the songs missed any punch. Guess that R3

Problem is that KEF for some reason is just way too expensive around these parts, Concerto Meta is 1030€ , R3 Meta is 2060€ , Q3 Meta shelves fit the buget, but not sure about those. At this point (since my posting) I've been thinking a lot about the shelves vs. towers problem, quite difficult decis