Marble

Unfortunately can vouch for this. If you're here from a web search, get a different router. This is on top of the slate ax requiring 4A in which pretty much no battery pack supports. Other GL iNet travel routers are more versatile. Carrying a back up router is probably a good if you can afford it +

There are always competitor products with similar/better feature sets. If you're happy using a GL.iNet travel router of your choice, great, power to you. I was personally disappointed with my Mudi V2 despite leveraging all of its features; it was painfully slow to boot, unreliable, carrying the ethe

Well, I’m certainly no expert myself and I wasn’t even trying to test the functionality of the product. All I did was connect the UTR to my home network using Teleport (which is super easy) and then try accessing my NAS in a web browser using its hostname. This is something I do regularly when I’m c

GL-iNet travel router and fire stick as others have mentioned. It’s a great combination. I wouldn’t shill the router though, it’s rubbish but only marginally gets the job done if the planets align. I bring the router because I use the laptop for work and the travel router makes all of this so easy.

People use travel routers like the Gl.iNet ones to put more devices on a captive portal. Not much help if you're already on a cruise! If you have any Android device with you there may be hope. Try installing NetShare on Android and setting it up. I needed this on a ferry in the Adriatic recently, ju

Tried the GL.iNet travel router for two years. The promise is great but I spent more time configuring it in hotel networks than actually using it. Ended up just tethering off my phone and accepting the slower speed.

I also use a GL.iNet travel router and see the UTR as a complementary product rather than a replacement. It’ll likely become my daily carry (coffee shops, daily working, train plane etc), with the GL.iNet staying as a more configurable longer term travel router (think hotel room with the family). Th